CU Course on Hegel,
01
Hegel and Marxism
G W F
Hegel refused to make anything easy. Towards the end of his Introduction to the
Encyclopaedia (1830) he wrote:
“As the whole science,
and only the whole, can exhibit what the Idea or system of reason is, it is
impossible to give in a preliminary way a general impression of a philosophy.
Nor can a division of philosophy into its parts be intelligible, except in
connection with the system.”
This could mean: Until you know it, you can’t know it. This
is not helpful!
But in practice, even Hegel fails to be completely
impossible. The same “Introduction to the Encyclopaedia” is actually one text
of Hegel’s that can be read relatively normally. We will come to it later in
this first part of our course on Hegel.
We will begin with a return to Marx. We are not going to
“learn Hegel” in its entirety in ten weeks, or at all. We are looking for the
salient points – the ones that stick out, so that we can have some dialogue
about them.
We are particularly looking at the relation of Hegel to
Marx, and so we may as well allow Karl Marx to explain that. Marx got his
doctorate in 1841 with a dissertation on the Philosophy of Epicurus, his only
overt work on philosophy. Immediately thereafter, he got involved with the Rheinische Zeitung magazine project,
soon becoming the editor. Marx then wrote a lot, including sometimes about
Hegel, until 1845 when, as we have argued elsewhere, he and Engels become for
the first time “Marxists” in full, coinciding with their joint writing of the “Theses on Feuerbach” and “The German Ideology”
(the latter book being left to the “gnawing criticism of the mice” until long
after their deaths).
Perhaps Marx was never a “Marxist”. He is supposed to have
denied it. To call him a “Marxist” critic of Hegel, in 1844, is certainly an
anachronism. Nevertheless, Marx was probably the best in-general critic of
Hegel alive at that moment, among many of them who had sprung up from the official
Prussian 1841
Expurgation of Hegel onwards.
We take Marx’s famous “Introduction
to a Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right” first (download linked below). The full
book, “Critique of
Hegel’s Philosophy of Right”, can also be found on the Marxists
Internet Archive. In the Introduction, the pre-Marxist Karl Marx writes:
“The criticism of the
German philosophy of state and right, which attained its most consistent,
richest, and last formulation through Hegel, is both a critical analysis of the
modern state and of the reality connected with it, and the resolute negation of
the whole manner of the German consciousness in politics and right as practiced
hereto, the most distinguished, most universal expression of which, raised to
the level of science, is the speculative philosophy of right itself.”
Marx’s “Critique
of Hegel’s Philosophy in General”,
also, like the Critique of the Philosophy of Right, never published in his
lifetime, is given here primarily (download linked below) because it moves
around Hegel’s works in a way that may assist readers to begin to mark out some
of the salient points. Marx knew his way around Hegel’s work. For example, Marx
writes;
“There is a double error in Hegel.
The first emerges most
clearly in the Phänomenologie,
the birth-place of the Hegelian philosophy...
“The outstanding
achievement of Hegel’s Phänomenologie and
of its final outcome, the dialectic of negativity as the moving and generating
principle, is thus first that Hegel conceives the self-creation of man as a
process, conceives objectification as loss of the object, as alienation and as
transcendence of this alienation; that he thus grasps the essence of labour and comprehends objective
man – true, because real man – as the outcome of man’s own labour.
“We shall now
demonstrate in detail Hegel’s one-sidedness and limitations as they are
displayed in the final chapter of the Phänomenologie, “Absolute Knowledge” – a chapter which
contains the condensed spirit of the Phänomenologie, the relationship of the Phänomenologie to speculative
dialectic, and also Hegel’s consciousness concerning
both and their relationship to one another.”
In that case one could read the whole of this passage of
Marx’s, and then read the final chapter of the
Phenomenology, and then one would have appreciated some of the strength
and the weakness of Hegel, at least as Marx saw it. And that is important,
because it is through Marx, as much as through anyone, that the legacy of Hegel
stands as large as it does in the world today.
Finally, in this long introduction, but to put the matter
fully in Karl Marx’s own hands, let us quote from his Afterword
to the 2nd German edition of “Capital” Volume 1 (1873). Here Marx
“openly avows himself the pupil of that mighty thinker [Hegel]”, and briefly
explains why:
“My dialectic method
is not only different from the Hegelian, but is its direct opposite. To Hegel,
the life process of the human brain, i.e., the process of thinking, which,
under the name of “the Idea,” he even transforms into an independent subject,
is the demiurgos of the real world, and the real world is only the external,
phenomenal form of “the Idea.” With me, on the contrary, the ideal is nothing
else than the material world reflected by the human mind, and translated into
forms of thought.
“The mystifying side
of Hegelian dialectic I criticised nearly thirty years ago, at a time when it
was still the fashion. But just as I was working at the first volume of “Das
Kapital,” it was the good pleasure of the peevish, arrogant, mediocre Epigonoi
[Epigones – Büchner, Dühring and others] who now talk large in cultured
Germany, to treat Hegel in same way as the brave Moses Mendelssohn in Lessing’s
time treated Spinoza, i.e., as a “dead dog.” I therefore openly avowed myself
the pupil of that mighty thinker, and even here and there, in the chapter on
the theory of value, coquetted with the modes of expression peculiar to him.
The mystification which dialectic suffers in Hegel’s hands, by no means
prevents him from being the first to present its general form of working in a
comprehensive and conscious manner. With him it is standing on its head. It
must be turned right side up again, if you would discover the rational kernel
within the mystical shell.
“In its mystified form,
dialectic became the fashion in Germany, because it seemed to transfigure and
to glorify the existing state of things. In its rational form it is a scandal
and abomination to bourgeoisdom and its doctrinaire professors, because it
includes in its comprehension and affirmative recognition of the existing state
of things, at the same time also, the recognition of the negation of that
state, of its inevitable breaking up; because it regards every historically
developed social form as in fluid movement, and therefore takes into account
its transient nature not less than its momentary existence; because it lets
nothing impose upon it, and is in its essence critical and revolutionary.”
- The above is to introduce the original reading-texts: Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right, Intro, 1844, and Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy in General, 1844, both by Karl Marx.
- To download any of the CU courses in PDF files please click here.
0 comments:
Post a Comment