Induction,
Part 0
Induction:
What it is, and what it is not
“Induction” is the process of making a new recruit, or a promoted
person, aware of everything necessary for an individual to perform normal
duties in an organisation, at any level.
Induction is therefore not the same thing as “Political
Education”, and this course will contain relatively little of what is usually
regarded as politics, compared to other Communist University courses. (For an
introductory course in political matters, please use the “Basics” course.)
History
of organisation
On the other hand, the material of the course is far from being
without political consequences. Organisation is not class-neutral, and it is
not apolitical. It has a history, and it has a pre-history of social structure even
if unselfconscious and led by “organic intellectuals”.
The conscious principles of organisation are as old as the origin
of the family, private property and the state. The oldest forms of organisation
are religious, legal and military, corresponding to the necessities of the
original state, when society first divided into antagonistic classes.
Among the oldest still-existing corporations in the West are the
Church of Rome and its orders. Notable among them is the order of St Benedict (480–547),
originating shortly after the fall of the Roman Empire in the West. The
Benedictine model relied not on allegiance to a central power, but on adherence
to a common set of rules (“St. Benedict’s Rule”). In
other words, it was truly “organised”. It relied on organisation more than on
what is nowadays called a “power structure”. We shall continue to sustain the critical
distinction between power and organisation, or between the mechanically
hierarchical and the socially organic, during this course.
The monastic tradition, that St Benedict successfully codified, had
earlier been brought to Europe from Africa (and it may have originated further
East, possibly in India). With this donation Africa helped to rescue Europe. It
was the monasteries that eventually brought Europe back from its descent into
barbarism. The Church provided the clerical framework and bureaucracy that the European
states needed while they grew again slowly, during a period of a thousand years,
during the centuries of feudalism that are called “The Dark Ages” and “The Middle
Ages”.
Companies
Secular trading corporations and permanent military organisation (standing
armies and navies) did not arrive until the bourgeoisie became (first in Italy)
a prosperous and powerful class, and at last, from the 16th and 17th
Centuries onwards, a ruling class in the Netherlands and in Britain.
The word “Office” comes from the Italian “Uffizi”, notably used in
Renaissance Florence. Double-entry book-keeping
was developed during the Italian Renaissance, in Florence and in Genoa, and was
for the first time described as a system by Luca Pacioli, a Franciscan Friar
and friend of Leonardo da Vinci’s, in Milan.
The bourgeois ability to organise on a large scale, and to project
its organisation overseas, meant that European culture at last surpassed, in
many ways, the level of development that the ancient Romans had achieved more
than a thousand years before. Unfortunately, bourgeois society was also no less
brutal than that of the Romans.
The ways and means of bourgeois organisation were among the
reasons for the success of capitalism over all other systems, most
spectacularly so following the French Revolution of 1789, its export by force
of arms under Napoleon Bonaparte, and the contemporary bourgeois “Industrial
Revolution” in England.
By the fifth decade of the 19th Century, bourgeois
capitalism was set to rule the world, such that in the same moment, Karl Marx
and Frederick Engels were able to observe, in the Communist Manifesto of 1848:
“All fixed, fast frozen relations, with their
train of ancient and venerable prejudices and opinions, are swept away, all
new-formed ones become antiquated before they can ossify. All that is solid
melts into air, all that is holy is profaned, and man is at last compelled to
face with sober senses his real condition of life and his relations with his
kind.... the bourgeoisie... must nestle everywhere, settle everywhere,
establish connections everywhere.”
Enter
the grave-digger
So long as the opponents of capitalism have less-well-developed
means of organisation, they are very unlikely to be able to succeed in
overthrowing the bourgeois class from its seat of power. But the working-class
proletariat that the bourgeoisie brings forth from the old agrarian society
that it has ruined, is drilled and organised - by the bourgeoisie - like no
other before it.
All that remains is for the working class to become a
self-conscious class for itself (the political task of the communists) and then
to seize hold of all the means that the bourgeoisie has developed, and forced
the working class to learn. The working class must become better at all kinds
of organisation than the previous masters of organisation, the bourgeoisie,
have been. And this is very possible.
Therefore, although we may appear in this course to be considering
other matters than politics, yet our motives for doing so are extremely
political. These are some of the indispensable means to power, and that is why
we want to possess them.
Attached, please find Amilcar Cabral’s pamphlet “Apply Party
Principles in Practice”. In it, please note that a “watchword” means the same
as what we would call a “slogan”.
·
The above is supported by an original reading-text: Amilcar Cabral,
1924-1973, Apply Party Principles in Practice.
0 comments:
Post a Comment