Basics,
Part 3a
Proletarians
and Communists
We only need one text for one discussion per week, but the
Communist University always gives alternatives, which can also be used for
supplementary reading. Yesterday we took the first part of the Communist Manifesto. Here is the second
part, called Proletarians and
Communists.
As with the first part of this highly-concentrated piece of
writing, the simplest way to present it is with selected quotes. Here are some:
The Communists do not
form a separate party opposed to the other working-class parties.
They have no interests separate and apart from
those of the proletariat as a whole.
They do not set up any sectarian principles of
their own, by which to shape and mold the proletarian movement.
The Communists are distinguished from the other
working-class parties by this only:
(1) In the national struggles of the
proletarians of the different countries, they point out and bring to the front
the common interests of the entire proletariat, independently of all
nationality.
(2) In the various stages of development which
the struggle of the working class against the bourgeoisie has to pass through,
they always and everywhere represent the interests of the movement as a whole.
The text then deals with property, and with marriage, in
similar terms to “The Origin of the
Family, Private Property and The State”, which was written 35 years
later. One of the remarkable things about the “Manifesto” is that it summarises
ideas which had not yet been published and knocked into shape by controversy,
yet it did so very accurately, and the Manifesto still stands tall today. On
ideas, and on the struggle of ideas, it says, among other things:
The ruling ideas of each age have ever been the
ideas of its ruling class.
When people speak of the ideas that
revolutionize society, they do but express that fact that within the old
society the elements of a new one have been created, and that the dissolution
of the old ideas keeps even pace with the dissolution of the old conditions of
existence.
The history of all past society has consisted
in the development of class antagonisms, antagonisms that assumed different
forms at different epochs.
But whatever form they may have taken, one fact
is common to all past ages, viz., the exploitation of one part of society by
the other. No wonder, then, that the social consciousness of past ages, despite
all the multiplicity and variety it displays, moves within certain common
forms, or general ideas, which cannot completely vanish except with the total
disappearance of class antagonisms.
The communist revolution is the most radical
rupture with traditional relations; no wonder that its development involved the
most radical rupture with traditional ideas.
Finally,
the Manifesto arrives, at the end of the second part, at the following
tremendous vision of communism as the purest possible kind of human freedom:
Political power, properly so called, is merely
the organized power of one class for oppressing another. If the proletariat… by
means of a revolution, makes itself the ruling class, and, as such, sweeps away
by force the old conditions of production, then it will, along with these
conditions, have swept away the conditions for the existence of class antagonisms
and of classes generally, and will thereby have abolished its own supremacy as
a class.
In place of the old
bourgeois society, with its classes and class antagonisms, we shall have an
association in which the free development of each is the condition for the free
development of all.
- The above is to introduce the original reading-text: Communist
Manifesto, Proletarians and Communists, Marx and Engels.
- To download any of the CU courses in PDF files please click here.
0 comments:
Post a Comment