Basics, Part 6a
Syndicalism
These Generic Courses are
designed for self-organised Freirean study circles, meeting on a regular weekly
basis without an outside lecturer. So there is a main text for each week. This
week, our main text has been “Worker Solidarity
and Unions” from MIA, combined with Procedure of Meetings, based on Wal
Hannington’s “Mr Chairman”. An
introduction to these texts was sent out under the heading “Vanguard”.
As well as a main text each
week, there is usually one, or more than one, supporting text, which may be
regarded as supplementary, alternative, or additional reading. This week the
supporting text to this discussion of the workers’ mass organisations and their
necessary counterpart, the revolutionary Party, is made up of extracts from
Lenin’s “What is to be Done?” (attached;
download linked below)
“Demagogues are the worst
enemies of the working class”, wrote Lenin, in this book.
Workerism
In “What is to be Done?”, Lenin
was concerned to oppose what he called “economism”, which is also called
“syndicalism” and in South Africa in the past and still up to now, “workerism”.
Lenin was concerned to show
(following the publication of Eduard Bernstein’s gradualist “Evolutionary Socialism”
and Rosa Luxemburg’s “Reform or Revolution?”)
that a revolutionary transformation of society was not possible without a professional,
revolutionary, political party of the working class. Trade union organisation
of the working class was never going to be sufficient.
In the process Lenin was
moved to denounce demagogy in the severest terms (see the quote above, which is
taken from the text that we are using today). One reason that Lenin denounced
demagogues so emphatically is because they misrepresent themselves as being
“left” or revolutionary, when in fact they are “right”, and in particular
gradualist, reformist and class-collaborationist.
Worker’s Control?
Sometimes syndicalism arrives
at a point where it proposes, demagogically, “worker’s control” under
capitalism. Marx and Lenin both denounced such tomfoolery – see, for
example, Marx’s “Critique of the
Gotha Programme”
Lenin showed that the
worker’s political party, the communist party, remains a “must-have”. To
achieve its goals the working class must combine in a vast association of the
whole nation; whereas the syndicalism of individual factories or isolated mines
is nothing more than a reversion to petty-bourgeois consciousness, in
conditions where such petty-bourgeois behaviour is hopelessly subordinated to a
bourgeois market that it cannot possibly control.
How will they sell their
products, unless on the terms of the Imperialists? This is why we say that
demagogy is nothing but the class enemy’s message, dressed up and re-sold in
fake-revolutionary clothes. Demagogues will even be found denouncing the real
revolutionaries as fakes.
When in doubt about such
things, it helps to study; and Lenin is a good person to study, because he was
good at telling the difference between genuine things, and fakes. Especially,
Lenin opposed syndicalism, workerism, gradualism, reformism and economism, all
of which still exist today.
“What is to be Done?” is the
book where Lenin most clearly differentiated the reformist mass organisations
from the vanguard political party of the working class, which is the communist
party. The downloadable file contains the most directly relevant passages.
·
The above is to
introduce the original reading-text: What is to be
Done, Workers and Revolutionaries, Lenin.
0 comments:
Post a Comment